Thank God the election will soon be over!
Yesterday I cast my absentee ballot. It was a very challenging vote. In addition to the national offices, in California we have to deal with a long list of initiatives, some pretty stupid and some incomprehensible. For example, we are asked whether actors in adult films should be required to wear condoms, whether we should increase taxes on others, whether people should be allowed to grow a limited number of marijuana plants for recreational purposes, whether our public schools should be told how to teach English to newcomers, and so forth. In most cases, these are technical issues that can be better decided by technical experts.
Yesterday I cast my absentee ballot. It was a very challenging vote. In addition to the national offices, in California we have to deal with a long list of initiatives, some pretty stupid and some incomprehensible. For example, we are asked whether actors in adult films should be required to wear condoms, whether we should increase taxes on others, whether people should be allowed to grow a limited number of marijuana plants for recreational purposes, whether our public schools should be told how to teach English to newcomers, and so forth. In most cases, these are technical issues that can be better decided by technical experts.
For the first time in presidential elections, I did
not vote for someone I thought was the best option for the country. I voted against
someone that I thought would be worse. This is a sad commentary on the two top
choices … two flawed and unworthy candidates for president of our great
country. Two individuals mistrusted by the majority of Americans.
Here you have two individuals who lack, on one side, honesty and, on the other, integrity. Voters, in essence, are being
asked to rank order these two valued virtues. Is honesty more important than
integrity or is it integrity more important than honesty: a kind of zero sum game. Depressing!
Lessons from
History
Not many know the story of King Pyrrhus. He was a general and statesman of the
Hellenistic period in Ancient Greece. At one time he controlled much of Greece
and Southern Italy. He was a strong opponent of the rising Roman power. As a
result, he fought many battles against them. Some of his battles,
though victorious, caused his army heavy losses.
Pyrrhus commented after one of his victories that if
he won another battle he would surely be ruined. Why? The cost of his victory
left his army much weakened. In the end, the Romans out maneuvered Pyrrhus’ army and defeated it.
Historians defined Pyrrhus lamentations a Pyrrhic
Victory -- any victory that inflicts such a devastating toll on the victor
that it is tantamount to defeat. Its heavy toll diminishes any sense of
achievement.
The dustbin of history is full of such victories
including but not limited to: the Battle of Bunker Hills (1775) during the American
Revolutionary period, the battle of the Bulge during WWII (1945), the battle of
Chosin Reservoir during the Korean War (1950), the battle of Mogadishu during Operation Restore Hope (1993), and the occupation following Iraq's defeat (2003).
Mistakes
Ignored Are Mistakes Repeated
Fast forward to 2016 primaries.
Trump singlehandly defeated 17 other contenders for the nomination. A Pyrrhic victory? He emerged as a much-weakened candidate. Why? By shamelessly attacking, demeaning, and ridiculing his opponents, he ended up losing their support. By engaging in bombast and personalized attacks, many came to challenge his character and fitness.
Trump singlehandly defeated 17 other contenders for the nomination. A Pyrrhic victory? He emerged as a much-weakened candidate. Why? By shamelessly attacking, demeaning, and ridiculing his opponents, he ended up losing their support. By engaging in bombast and personalized attacks, many came to challenge his character and fitness.
Clinton, on the other hand, won the nomination by
walloping Bernie Sanders. Her Pyrrhic Victory? She shamelessly trivialized Bernie
Sanders’ policies and in the process alienated his supporters. She emerged from
the primary with a large number of Bernie’s supporters still refusing to
support her candidacy. By playing hide and seek with her email scandal, she
fostered the notion that she is secretive, and not to be trusted.
What happened to the real issues and potential
solutions? They have more or less disappeared from public view. Here are some
of them:
· Controlling
the excesses of Wall Street
· Fixing or
replacing Obama Care
· Creating new
jobs and retaining existing ones
· International
fair trade policies
· Social justice issues
· Growing the
country’s GNP
· Reducing a
suffocating national debt
· Securing our borders
and streamlining the immigration laws
· More
affordable college tuition
· A more
holistic energy policy
· Fixing our
decaying infrastructure
· A clearer
strategy for defeating ISL and terrorism
Tackling these issues would surely advance everyone’s
wellbeing. We cannot ignore these facts:
· We have the
lowest worker participation in history
· The poverty
level is stubbornly high
· The size of our national debt has doubled
· Healthcare
costs continue to skyrocket
· Middle East
and Libya in flames
· Immigration
system in disarray
· Student
loans’ exploding liability
· Racial strife
in urban areas
· Perception
that system is rigged
· Crumbling
infrastructure
Fast forward
to the 2016 General Election.
A hostile press has pilloried Trump mercilessly: his
style, his policies, his business practices, and his peccadillos. His
unorthodox approach and fiery temperament have contributed to potential defeat
by his own hand.
The publishing of a video showing Trump in a so-called
locker room dialog was the October surprise the Democrats had in store. The
video did not just surface. It was in the hands of the press for months. The
emergence of several women, who accused Trump of sexual harassment, was very well
orchestrated to extract maximum pain. No one can in real conscience condone the
kinds of behaviors and words used by Trump. Indiscriminate attacks on Moslems, immigrants, and war veterans surely
have not helped his cause either. All adds up to self-destruction.
Clinton, on the
other hand, has been hounded by multiple scandals, but has deftly managed the
news with help from a more congenial press. However, the steady drip-drip of emails from Wikileaks, the continuing saga of the private server, and alleged pay-to-play scandal with
the family foundation continue to dog her. The chicanery of her staff trying
to do damage control has hurt rather than help. Lastly, disclosure of her private remarks casting dispersion on
Bernie’s followers, "deplorable" GOP voters, private versus public policy
positions, and her open border secret wish have heightened the level of mistrust
folks have for her.
What Next?
With a mere 22 days to go, the two candidates are locked
in a sort of death dance, and are separated by a few points, in the margin of error territory.
Neither candidate enjoys the support of more than 50% of potential voters. Whoever will win might not be elected by the majority of voters.
Neither candidate enjoys the support of more than 50% of potential voters. Whoever will win might not be elected by the majority of voters.
This is ominous, because it portends another Pyrrhic
Victory: winning the presidency without the support of the majority of
Americans.
At a time when the country needs to be more united,
the seeds of more animus will yield further divisions. This
disunity will impact importantly needed legislation.
Personal attacks and exposes will continue.
Personal attacks and exposes will continue.
No comments:
Post a Comment